.png?width=200&height=41&name=Logo%20Humakina%20new%202025%20(1).png){kind=small}
.png?width=200&height=41&name=Logo%20Humakina%20white%20new%202025%20(1).png){kind=small}
-2.png?width=300&name=image%20(19)-2.png)
Statec publishes its panorama of work on May 1st. The verdict: only 34% of residents still hold to the classic model of full-time, permanent employment, Monday to Friday, 8am to 5pm. For human resources departments, this is no longer a weak signal. It's the framework.
This observation, made on April 28 by Statec in the spring issue of its magazine Regards, overturns a tenacious image. Full-time, open-ended employment, from Monday to Friday between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., now concerns just 34% of workers resident in the Grand Duchy. The remaining 66% have at least one atypical form of organization.
For human resources managers, this figure is not just another statistic. It describes the operational reality of a market that employs 494,000 people, 47% of them cross-border commuters, and only one in four of Luxembourg nationality.
Growing fragmentation by sector
Behind the average lies a highly contrasting sectoral geography. Horeca accounts for 78% of residents working atypical hours, followed by agriculture at 70% and transport and warehousing at 63%. Evening work, after 6 p.m., concerns 36% of resident employees.
Saturdays account for 29%, Sundays for 21%, and nights (between midnight and 5 a.m.) for 15%. Shift work remains below 20% on average, but reaches 54% in the transport sector and 49% in the hotel and catering sector. Part-time work accounts for 18.4% of residents, virtually unchanged from 2021. Photography remains highly gendered: 29.1% of women versus 9.0% of men.
As for contracts, the share of fixed-term contracts stands at 9.1%, versus 7.4% in 2022 and 2023. This is a discreet but real sign of a contractual casualization that deserves to be monitored. This dispersal redefines what is meant by the word "team". HR policies designed for employees working simultaneously, from Monday morning to Friday evening, are becoming less and less of a fiction.
For CHROs, the question is no longer whether to adapt to this diversity of schedules, but how to manage it without creating second-class employees.
Telecommuting, a dividing line between skilled profiles and presence-based professions
The study documents another fundamental break. Telecommuting now concerns 36% of people in employment, compared with 19% in 2018 and a peak of 39% in 2021. The level has stabilized. But the overall picture masks a very clear segmentation.
In offshore activities, the rate reaches 80%. It is 69% in finance and insurance, 64% in information and communication, and 56% in scientific and professional activities.
Conversely, it falls to 23% in teaching and 9% in health and social work. The divide widens by profile. Skilled white-collar workers telework at 49%, low-skilled white-collar workers at 11%, skilled blue-collar workers at 3%, and low-skilled blue-collar workers hardly at all.
Telecommuting is therefore not a widespread practice: it's a concentrated advantage, which follows the line of qualification and the nature of the job.
For employer branding policies, the stakes have shifted. Promising flexibility is no longer enough. You have to be able to explain why it is or isn't available in a given job, and what the rewards are.
Women and men: a family imbalance that is not disappearing
Among residents aged 18 to 54 who have raised children, 63% have taken some form of family leave. The gender gap is massive: 77% for women, 48% for men. The duration of leave also differs. Nearly 90% of men take a maximum of one year off work, and 28% no more than one month.
Among women, almost half stay between six months and a year. Overall, 61% of women say they have adapted or interrupted their work activity for family reasons, compared to 45% of men.
These discrepancies are not just a question of equality. They have an impact on career paths, pay and access to management positions. Any gender diversity policy that ignores the question of time and leave misses the point.
What HR departments can do about it
Three lessons emerge. The first concerns the coherence of internal policies. Continuing to organize corporate life around a norm that no longer concerns more than a third of residents means depriving oneself of some of one's talents and weakening the commitment of others. The second concerns perceived fairness.
When telecommuting varies from less than 1% to 80% depending on the function, transparency on criteria becomes a condition for adherence. The third concerns measurement. Without fine-grained data on actual working hours, vacations and differences between populations, no HR policy can claim to pilot what this panorama describes.
The Luxembourg labor market is not going through a model crisis. It's changing. The HR function has little interest in defending the old model. It has everything to gain by documenting, explaining and arbitrating the new.